Legal Opinion

City of Kewanee v. Puskar

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1923No. 14737PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duncan

The city of Kewanee filed a declaration in debt in the city court of Kewanee against Mike Puskar, plaintiff in error, herein referred to as defendant. The declaration as finally amended contained eleven counts. The first count charged the defendant with suffering a nuisance to exist on June 5, 1920, within the corporate limits of the city, by knowingly permitting certain premises owned by him to be used as a boarding house or rooming house within which intoxicating liquor was kept for sale as a beverage, in violation of section 5 of article 3, chapter 17, of the revised ordinances of the city…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. BrocampIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Village of Lee v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  3. George v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Frese v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  5. McCarthy v. LazarusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Redarowicz v. OhlendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. The People v. KimmelIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Village of Midlothian v. WallingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  4. City of Chicago v. Albert J. Schorsch Realty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  5. City of West Frankfort v. PellegreneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API