Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Lipsitz v. Perez
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided November 2, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 66-397PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Howard Charles Lipsitz petitions the court for relief from an alleged illegal induction under the Selective Service System.1 He claims that the Selective Service Regulation 32 C.F.R. 1627.8 has not been complied with, and that therefore his induction was illegal. The Regulation provides as follows:
The Local Board shall not issue an Order for a registrant to report for induction either during the period afforded the registrant to take an appeal to the President or during the period such an appeal is pending. Any order to report for induction which has been issued…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Billings v. TruesdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Eagles v. United States Ex Rel. SamuelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Richter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. T. Vail Palmer, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Local Draft Board No. 1 v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BraniganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Laino v. Secretary of DefenseDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1968
- United States v. BraniganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969