Legal Opinion

Zuzak v. Querbes

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1939No. 5924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Judge.

Brokerage commissions in the amount of $720 are claimed in this proceeding by plaintiff, a duly licensed and bonded real estate agent, under a written contract which he had with defendant relative to the leasing of property belonging to the latter. The commissions are allegedly due by reason of a renewal of the original contract of lease that he negotiated.

Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff for the stated amount, and defendant appealed.

In the month of November, 1929, defendant was negotiating through plaintiff, who operated as F. J. Zuzak & Co., with a co-partnership…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brinson v. Monroe Automobile & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  2. Allwin Realty Co. v. BarthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Rosenblum v. LurieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Mitchnik v. BrennanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936
  5. Odell v. WessingerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Latter & Blum, Inc. v. Von RuekfrangLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Cotter v. NaomiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Latter & Blum, Inc. v. KogosLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API