Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Van Horn

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1921No. 16125PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lincoln county, Truax, J., entered January 21, 1920, after a trial on the merits to the court, dismissing the complaint and quieting defendants’ title in an action for partition.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

— This action was brought by the plaintiffs for partition of certain described lands. The complaint alleged ownership in plaintiffs of an undivided one-half interest in and to the lands and as tenants in common with the defendants. The defendants for answer to the complaint denied that the plaintiffs had any interest in or to the described real estate. As a first affirmative defense, they alleged the matter had been adjudicated; as a second affirmative defense, that certain agreements, signed by two of the defendants, were obtained by fraud, overreaching and by undue influence. These…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McRea v. WarehimeWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Vanhorn v. NestossWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Plummer v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Plummer v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Enos v. KeatingWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  2. In Re Boyd's GuardianshipNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Farmers' State Bank v. YoungquistSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API