Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. Singleton
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 12, 1951No. 1030PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellees submitted a proposal or bid to the District of Columbia for furnishing certain supplies for a total price of $7,530.15. The District notified appellees that their proposal was accepted and sent them contract forms for execution. Appellees refused to sign the contract and notified the District that they could not comply with the ■bid. 1 The District then purchased the supplies from another source at a cost of $813.-61 in excess of appellees’ bid, and thereafter brought this' action to recover that ■amount from appellees.
Appellees moved to dismiss the complaint…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Ackerlind v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- James F. Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
- New York & P. R. S. S. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Edmund J. Flynn Company v. SchlosserDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- District of Columbia v. McGregor Properties, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Singleton v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952