Legal Opinion

Neary v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided September 6, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00338Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION AMY NEARY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) v. ) Cause No. 3:20-CV-338-RLM-MGG ) THOR MOTOR COACH, INC., and ) FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER Amy Neary and Susan Eckenrode sued Thor Motor Coach, Inc. and Ford Motor Company alleging that their RV was defective in violation of state and federal law. Thor and Ford moved for summary judgment on all claims, arguing that they didn't violate that parties’ limited warranty and that they didn't have an opportunity to repair all of the RV's alleged defects.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Willard L. Hemsworth, II v. quotesmith.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Mary Carroll v. Merrill LynchCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Monroe v. Indiana Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API