Legal Opinion

Kourounis v. Raleigh

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 1993No. 16116PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cook, Presiding Judge.

This case involves the denial of a motion to intervene as of right, Civ.R. 24(A)(2). Appellant, the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (“Goodyear”), appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion to intervene for the purpose of appeal, filed after entry of a final judgment which adversely affected its interests. We affirm, finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Goodyear’s motion and that Norton v. Sanders (1989), 62 Ohio App.3d 39, 574 N.E.2d 552, upon which Goodyear relies, is distinguishable from the present case.

Background of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. City of Norton v. SandersOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. First New Shiloh Baptist Church v. MeagherOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Southern Ohio Coal Co. v. KidneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Cleveland Construction, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Administrative ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State Ex Rel. Gray Road Fill, Inc. v. WrayOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State ex rel. First New Shiloh Baptist Church v. MeagherOhio Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API