Legal Opinion

Tang v. Putruss

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 5, 2007No. 06-12624PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SEAN F. COX, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Cross-Motions for summary judgment on the Copyright Claim. The parties have briefed the issues. Pursuant to E.D.Mich. LR 7.1, the court declines to hold a hearing. For the following reasons, the Court:(1) GRANTS in part, and DENIES in part, Plaintiffs Motion for partial summary judgment, the Motion is denied with respect to (a) finding of liability and (b) a finding that each photograph constitutes a separate “work,” but granted to the extent that (a) Defendant Maria’s Collection did not have an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Clarence Erwin Copeland v. Mark MacHulis James StephensCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  4. Karen L. Erickson v. Trinity Theatre, Inc., Individually and D/B/A Trinity Square EnsembleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Johnson v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yellow Pages Photos, Inc. v. Yellow Pages Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Reinsdorf v. Skechers U.S.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
  3. Corwin v. QuinonezDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
  4. Beard v. HelmanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API