Legal Opinion
In re Toy Asbestos Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 31, 2021No. 4:19-cv-00325Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 Case No. 19-cv-00325-HSG 8 IN RE TOY ASBESTOS ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF CAPTAIN 9 FRANCIS BURGER 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 440, 451 11 12 Pending before the Court are the motions to exclude the testimony of Captain Francis 13 Burger, Ret., filed by Defendants Warren Pumps, LLC and Armstrong International, Inc. Dkt. 14 Nos. 440, 451. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and 15 the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Cooper v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- 45 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 149, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,674, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5160, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8334 Peter Alexander Lust, by and Through Peter Lust, His Guardian Ad Litem v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Corporation Does 1-20, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.