Legal Opinion

Van Etten v. Newton

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 2, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for reargument, or for leave to appeal to the court of appeals. For statement and former opinion, see 6 FT. Y. Supp. 531.

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

There is no question of law in this case which would justify us in sending the appeal to the court of appeals. The effect of the stipulation in the order for the coal which the defendants gave to plaintiffs was to relieve them from liability for demurrage, unless the detention of the boat was due to other than unjust or improper delay on defendants’ part in loading, where it does not appear that the recipient of the order was ignorant of the conditions indorsed upon it. Rackett v. Stickney, 23 Blatchf. 566, 27 Fed. Rep. 878. But there is a question of fact in the case upon which appellant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rackett v. StickneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hokanson v. Western Empire Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Shaver v. GillespieNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API