Legal Opinion
McDonnell v. Bank of China
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 15, 1929No. 5687Published
1Opinion of the Court
33 F.2d 816 (1929)
McDONNELL
v.
BANK OF CHINA et al.[*]
No. 5687.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 15, 1929.
Fleming, Franklin & Allman, of Shanghai, China, and Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, of San Francisco, Cal. (Alfred Sutro and Eugene M. Prince, both of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellant and cross-appellee.
P. H. B. Kent, of Tientsin, China, and Frank E. Hinckley, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees and cross-appellants.
Before RUDKIN, DIETRICH, and WILBUR, Circuit Judges.
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
August 1, 1927, R. T. McDonnell became the assignee of American Overseas…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Casey v. CavarocSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Union Trust Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Merchants' & Manufacturers' Bank v. HibbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Wulfsohn v. Russo-Asiatic BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- China Press, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.