Legal Opinion
Center Drainage District No. 1 v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided January 3, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The sole issue presented by this appeal is: Did the failure of the district to finish the work by asking for bids under sec. 89.48, Stats., excuse the bonding company and the contractor from all liability resulting from breach of contract and abandonment of the work?
Sec. 89.48, Stats., provides as follows:
“(1) In all cases where the work to be done at any time under the direction of the commissioners shall in their opinion cost to exceed two thousand dollars unless the court has authorized the district itself to do the work the commissioners shall advertise for bids on such work in some…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ricketson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- City of Madison v. American Sanitary Engineering Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Baumann v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Town of Beloit v. HeinemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Central Lime & Cement Co. v. Leyden-Ortseifen Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holzbauer v. Safway Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- (1972), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1972