Legal Opinion

In re Christey

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application for a writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtWoodward, J.

'This is a proceeding for a writ of mandamus brought by'the applicant, Captain Arthur B. Christey, to compel the defendant, as comptroller of Buffalo, to countersign and deliver to him a warrant directed drawn in favor of the applicant by the common council of the city, with the approval of the mayor, which the comptroller refuses to countersign or deliver. The voucher in question represents the amount of counsel fees and disbursements incurred by Captain Christey in a mandamus proceeding, instituted by him some time ago, to compel his continuance in the office of auditor of the city to which…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Peterson v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Matter of Chapman v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Board of Supervisors v. . EllisNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Stemmler v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Donahue v. KeeshanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fleischmann v. GravesNew York Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Seif v. City of Long BeachNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Blazejewski v. EckertNew York Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API