Legal Opinion

United States v. Madrid

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided September 25, 2012No. EP-11-CR-2903-DB(2),(4)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DAVID BRIONES, Senior District Judge.

Before the Court are Defendants Jesus Madrid (“Madrid”) and Billy Omar Ruvalcaba-Madrid’s (“Ruvalcaba”) (collectively “Defendants”) Motions to Suppress Wiretap Evidence [ECF Nos. 168, 169] and the United States of America’s (“the Government”) respective Response [ECF Nos. 174, 175]. Also before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Reconsider Motion to Suppress [ECF Nos. 200, 201] and the Government’s respective Responses [ECF Nos. 204, 206]. For the reasons that follow, the Court finds that Defendants’ Motions should be denied.

BA…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API