United States v. Madrid
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DAVID BRIONES, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendants Jesus Madrid (“Madrid”) and Billy Omar Ruvalcaba-Madrid’s (“Ruvalcaba”) (collectively “Defendants”) Motions to Suppress Wiretap Evidence [ECF Nos. 168, 169] and the United States of America’s (“the Government”) respective Response [ECF Nos. 174, 175]. Also before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Reconsider Motion to Suppress [ECF Nos. 200, 201] and the Government’s respective Responses [ECF Nos. 204, 206]. For the reasons that follow, the Court finds that Defendants’ Motions should be denied.
BA…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.