Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1998No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly refused to admit into evidence a statement made by defendant’s brother. The court properly determined that the declarant was not aware that his statement was against his penal interest and thus that the statement was not sufficiently reliable to be admissible under that exception to the hearsay rule (see, People v Settles, 46 NY2d 154, 167; see also, People v Shortridge, 65 NY2d 309, 312). The court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s CPL 440.10 motion to vacate the judgment based on evidence that was allegedly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. GallowayNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. SalemiNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. People v. DaddonaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. PritchettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. People v. ThibodeauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API