Legal Opinion

People v. Pritchett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s request for a circumstantial evidence charge. Where, as here, a case is based on both direct and circumstantial evidence of defendant’s guilt, defendant is not

*947entitled to a circumstantial evidence instruction (see, People v Roldan, 88 NY2d 826, 827; People v Daddona, 81 NY2d 990, 992; People v Jones [appeal No. 1], 256 AD2d 1172, lv denied 93 NY2d 972; People v Jacobsen, 255 AD2d 951, lv denied 93 NY2d 972). Although the court erred in allowing defendant to be cross-examined concerning prior charges of which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. DaddonaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. RoldanNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. CastaldiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. People v. TurnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. FlowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API