Tower Insurance v. Dockside Associates Pier 30 LP
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SAVAGE, District Judge.
Moving for summary judgment, Tower Insurance Company of New York (“Tower”) and Everest National Insurance Company (“Everest”) seek a declaration that they have no duty to defend or indemnify Dockside Associates Pier 30, LP (“Dockside”) and DePaul Management Company (“DePaul”) in an action pending in Pennsylvania state court.1 They contend that the claims against Dockside and DePaul in the underlying action are not covered under the commercial general liability insurance policies issued by them because the claims arise out of a contract. In the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner US, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- The Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Co., Inc., in No. 98-7552 v. The Travelers Insurance Company (d.c. Civ. No. 98-Cv-00643) the Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Co., Inc., in No. 98-7553 v. United States Fire Insurance Company (d.c. Civ. No. 98-Cv-00758)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Saarman Construction, Ltd. v. Ironshore Specialty Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Saarman Construction, Ltd. v. Ironshore Specialty Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- ATAIN INSURANCE COMPANY v. BASEMENT WATERPROOFING SPECIALIST, INC. D/B/A OLD FAMILY CONSTRUCTIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- COMMUNITY BANK v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Netherlands Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2014