Legal Opinion

Patterson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 6, 1965No. 37322PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is sodomy; the punishment, two years.

In view of our disposition of this appeal, a statement of the facts is deemed unnecessary.

Bill of Exception No. 1 reads as follows:

“BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the trial of the above styled and numbered cause, that while Z. D. Allen, one of the attorneys for the Defendant, was arguing the case to the Jury he said ‘where is Alfred Bohannon, he was indicted for this same offense, the State could call him, but we * * * ’ and started to argue further the State’s failure to call the co-indictee Alfred Bohannon, as a witness.
“One of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Washburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. Quillin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Offerle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Rangel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fant-Caughman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
  2. Barragan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Abdullah, StedmondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Abdullah, StedmondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Fant, Paul v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API