Legal Opinion
Andersen v. Andersen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 12, 1985No. C1-85-754, C8-85-282PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
Appellants Michael N. Andersen and Hazel E. Andersen appeal from a judgment entered November 6, 1984, which the trial court attempted to amend on February 15, 1985, after this appeal was filed. The parties dispute the court’s method of partitioning a jointly-owned farming operation and raise other issues such as unjust enrichment, tortious interference with contract relations, and general abuse of discretion.
We consolidated the appeals, and now affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for entry of judgment partitioning the property.
FACTS
Hazel, Norman and Michael…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Furlev Sales & Associates, Inc. v. North American Automotive Warehouse, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Evans v. BlesiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Carlson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hoverson v. HoversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fette v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Neumann v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018