United States Motor Co. v. Baughman Automobile Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Affidavit of illegality; from city court of Bainbridge — Judge Spooner. June 26, 1914.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
The United States Motor Company obtained a judgment by default against Baughman Automobile Company, it being recited in the judgment that the defendant had been served as the law directed. On March 5, 1914, an execution which was issued upon this judgment was levied upon an automobile as the property of the defendant. Thereupon the defendant filed an affidavit of illegality, alleging that it had never been served with any process or other notice of the pendency of the suit; and at the time of the alleged service B. E. Lewis, deputy sheriff, had not qualified as deputy sheriff of the city…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. Bibb Brick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Mitchell v. Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Phillips v. BondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- National Bank v. Southern Porcelain Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Powell v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- State v. GiangregorioCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Gibbs v. Rhodes Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Busey v. MilamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- State v. GiangregorioCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.