Legal Opinion

United States v. Demetrius Pruitt

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2006No. 05-3577PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcKEAGUE, J., joined by Siler, J.,

CLAY (pp. 485-91), delivered a separate concurring opinion.

OPINION

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant Demetrius Pruitt appeals the district court’s grant of the Government’s motion for reconsideration of Pruitt’s motion to suppress evidence obtained during a protective sweep of a third-party’s residence. For the reasons that follow, the ruling of the district court is affirmed.

I. BACKGROUND

In June of 2004, Demetrius Pruitt was on parole following his conviction for possession of cocaine, possession of marijuana, and possession of drug-use paraphernalia in violation of Ohio law. Pruitt…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. El Bey v. RoopCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. HardinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. State v. Martin (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  4. United States v. WerraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. Duran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API