Legal Opinion
Heuser v. Kephart
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 30, 2000No. 98-2233PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs/appellants Anthony and Nona Heuser (plaintiffs) bring this timely appeal from a judgment of the district court dismissing, pursuant to a putative settlement agreement, a suit they brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Section 1983 action alleged constitutional violations by state, county and city officials in denying electrical services to plaintiffs, inter alia. Contending that no enforceable settlement agreement had been reached, the plaintiffs opposed the dismissal below and now ask this court to reverse the judgment of dismissal.
I
A
Because the issues in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Robert Stewart v. Donald DongesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Louie Morris, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. City of Hobart, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Louis E. FULGENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. RAY McDERMOTT & CO., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. HardageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chavez v. State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Spiess v. MeyersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Feerer v. Amoco Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Fender v. Kansas Social & Rehabilitation ServicesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Sprint Nextel Corp. v. Middle Man, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.