Legal Opinion

Woodall v. North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank of Durham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClauksoN, J.

C. S., 860, in part, is as follows: “A receiver may be appointed (1) before judgment, on the application of either party, when he establishes an apparent right to property which is the subject of the action and in the possession of an adverse party, and the property or its rents and profits are in danger of being lost, or materially injured or impaired; except in eases where judgment upon failure to answer may be had on application to the court.” N. 0. Prac. & Proe. (McIntosh), sec. 887, p. 1002; see. 888, p. 1003.

C. S., 861: “In all cases where there is an application for the appointment of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. John L. Roper Lumber Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Lewis v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Hurwitz v. Carolina Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Hanna v. . HannaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. Durant v. . CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reynolds Ex Rel. Cannon v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Newman MacHine Company v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Alexander v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Neighbors v. . EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API