Legal Opinion

Rye v. Dupont Rayon Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1931PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

The original petition was filed under the Workmen's Compensation Act, chapter 123, Acts of 1919. When called for hearing in the circuit court, the petition was dismissed for failure to prosecute. Upon the refusal of the court to sustain petitioner’s motion to set aside the order of dismissal, an appeal was prayed, granted and perfected, but subsequently dismissed.

A second petition similar to the first was then filed to recover upon the facts stated in the first petition. It contains a statement that’ the first petition was filed,, after notice given, or waived, as required Tby section 23 of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oman v. DeliusTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HayTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. GrigsbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. La Follette Coal, Iron & Railway Co. v. MintonTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Vaught v. Virginia & Southwestern RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. Middle Tennessee AnesthesiologyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  2. Hardy Lee Jamison, Jr., Father and Next of Kin of Hardy Lee Jamison, Iii, Deceased v. Memphis Transit Management CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  3. Woods v. PalmerTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  4. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. KirklandTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Patrick v. DicksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API