Legal Opinion

Aycock v. Aycock

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1994No. 9326DC369PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.

The trial court entered an order of equitable distribution based upon the parties’ stipulation that their property should be divided equally between them. Because we find the stipulation ineffectual, we must vacate and remand. Our disposition of this appeal renders a recitation of the facts unnecessary.

In its order, the trial court found as a fact that the parties had stipulated to an equal distribution of marital property in an Equitable Distribution Pre-Trial Order. The court entered a conclusion of law to the same effect. Defendant contends the court erred in finding and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Cornelius v. CorneliusCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hurley v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API