Legal Opinion
Hyde v. Van Wormer
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 18, 1985No. 84-1993PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ante, p. 827. Motion of federal respondents for award of damages granted, and damages awarded to federal respondents only in the amount of $500 pursuant to this Court’s Rule 49.2. Motion of respondents Inland Steel Co. et al. for award of damages granted, and damages in the amount of $500 awarded pursuant to this Court’s Rule 49.2. Request of Inland Steel Co. et al. for award of double costs pursuant to Rule 50.7 denied. Motion of petitioner for award of costs and fees denied.
Justice Blackmun dissents from the awards of damages.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Walter G. Finch v. Hughes Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Romala Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- A. Hirsh, Inc. v. The United States, and Paint Applicators Trade Action CoalitionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- In Re Amendment to Rule 39Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Thomas A. Toepfer v. Department of Transportation, FaaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.