Legal Opinion

Fullerton v. General Motors Corp.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided January 11, 2006No. 05-01-P-SPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE

DAVID M. COHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.

The defendant has filed two motions in limine and the plaintiffs one, all seeking to exclude or limit the testimony of various expert witnesses at trial. I deny all but a portion of one of the motions.

I. Applicable Legal Standard

Both parties seek to exclude expert testimony pursuant to Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 119 S.Ct. 1167, 143 L.Ed.2d 238 (1999). Defendant’s Motion to Exclude or Limit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Estate v. International Harvester CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  4. Elwell v. Conair, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2001
  5. Pappas v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API