Legal Opinion

Oken v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 17, 2003No. 117, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRELL, Judge.

It is Maryland’s turn to consider the effect, if any, of the U.S. Supreme Court’s holding in Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), upon its capital punishment statutory scheme. At least eleven state supreme courts have preceded us in pondering the same question as regards their respective statutes.1 Of those states, four, Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, and Nevada, concluded that Ring *183compelled invalidation of some part of their statutes as written. The remaining six states, Alabama, California, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, and Oklahoma, concluded…

2Cases cited95 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Abeokuto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Nunnery v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. FryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API