Oken v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
HARRELL, Judge.
It is Maryland’s turn to consider the effect, if any, of the U.S. Supreme Court’s holding in Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), upon its capital punishment statutory scheme. At least eleven state supreme courts have preceded us in pondering the same question as regards their respective statutes.1 Of those states, four, Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, and Nevada, concluded that Ring *183compelled invalidation of some part of their statutes as written. The remaining six states, Alabama, California, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, and Oklahoma, concluded…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Ritchie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Abeokuto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Nunnery v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. FryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.