Legal Opinion

United States v. Daniel Koenig

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 20, 1972No. 71-1628PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Appellant’s pro se pleading in the district court seeks relief from a custodial sentence imposed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4208(c). The pleading, construed as a motion pursuant to Fed.R. Crim.P. 35, was filed more than 120 days after final sentence, and thus was untimely. See United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 226, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960). Construed as a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The sentence is within the range authorized by the statute, and the fact that pieces of a bullet lodged in…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Graham v. Government of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API