Transworld Drilling Co. v. Levingston Shipbuilding Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURGESS, Justice.
This is an appeal involving the interpretation of an indemnity clause of a contract. Transworld Drilling Company contracted with Levingston Shipbuilding Company for the repair of an off-shore drilling rig. Under the contract Levingston would perform certain repairs and alterations, but Trans-world reserved the right to perform certain tasks. One of the tasks Transworld reserved for its regular rig crews was the replacement of a crane. The contractual provision states: “Transworld will utilize its regular rig crews for accomplishing most of the work listed below but…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Burnett v. MotykaTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Dietz Memorial Co. v. Texas Steel Building Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Tindal v. State ex rel. Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental RetardationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hardy v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Merit Drilling Co. v. Honish, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
- Exxon Corp. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Vernon J. Copous, Sr., Etc. v. Odeco Oil & Gas Co., Defendant-Third Party v. Building Service & Repair, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Haring v. Bay Rock Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.