Legal Opinion
In re Appeal of Hildebrand
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 16, 2007No. 05-537PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Joan Hildebrand, and her son James, appeal the Environmental Court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment. The court ruled that the Waitsfield Planning Commission had appropriately denied the Hildebrands’ application to amend the subdivision permit because they had not demonstrated a change in circumstances. We affirm.
V 2. A review of the history of the parcel under consideration is necessary to understand the case. In 1992, the Neill family sought approval from the Waitsfield Town Planning Commission to subdivide their 183.5 acre farm, located on both sides of East Warren Road,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of South Burlington v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- In Re Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- In Re Nehemiah Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Washington v. PierceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- In Re Appeal of Department of Buildings & General ServicesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re HildebrandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Lake Carmi, LLC CU Application CU ApplicationVermont Superior Court · 2008
- Morrill House, LLC & Smith VarianceVermont Superior Court · 2010