In re Estate of Schiehl
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 54, Oct. T-, 1896, by-Peter Schiehl, from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., May T., 1895, No. 6, dismissing exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication. Before Over, J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Errors assigned were in dismissing exceptions to adjudication.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Green,
The mortgage in question in tliis case was made in 1883 by the appellee Margaret Armbruster, to the decedent Rosin a Schiehl, to secure the payment of 11,500. It was duly recorded •and was in possession of the decedent during the remainder of her life, and at the time of her death. The mortgagor made many payments of interest on it during the decedent’s life, and ■sold her some groceries which were to go on account of interest. At the death of the testatrix this mortgage was among her papers and constituted apparently a part of her estate. The mortgagor, having…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Campbell's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847
- Kidder v. KidderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- Davidson v. of YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Zimmerman v. StreeperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
- Livingood's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kaufmann's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Fouts v. NanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Ogden v. Philadelphia & West Chester Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Lower v. LowerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- O'Gorman v. JolleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.