Legal Opinion

Rivera v. Time Warner Cable

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

We find unpersuasive the appellant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by the trial court’s conduct. The trial court’s interjections, albeit frequent, were designed to, and did, elicit and clarify facts material to the issues in the trial and expedite the progress of the trial (LaMotta v City of New York, 130 AD2d 627), and were performed in an "evenhanded, nonprejudicial” manner (Vialva v City of New York, 118 AD2d 701, 704). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. LaMotta v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Vialva v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lopez v. SheskierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999