Legal Opinion

United States v. Mahmood

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 3, 2006No. 05 CR 30056 MAPPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS (Docket No. 15)

PONSOR, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant, Asif Mahmood, has been charged in a one-count indictment with engaging in marriage fraud to evade the immigration laws. On October 6, 2005, he moved to suppress oral and written statements he made to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) agents investigating the alleged offense, on the ground that his rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), were violated.

On December 1, 2005, the court heard testimony bearing on the motion…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of New Hampshire v. Timothy McKennaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  2. State of New Hampshire v. Timothy McKennaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API