Southwestern New Hampshire Transportation Co. v. Durham
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
In this state the arbitration of disputes statute (RSA ch. 542) applies to arbitration agreements between employers and employees only if “such agreement specifically provides that it shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter.” RSA 542:1. The collective bargaining agreement in this case is subject to the provisions of RSA ch. 542 by its express terms. This brings into play RSA 542:8 which empowers the court to confirm an award and also provides that the court may correct or modify arbitration awards (1) “for plain mistake”; or may vacate them (2) “for fraud, corruption, or misconduct…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Bel Pre Medical Center, Inc. v. Frederick Contractors, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Kearsarge Metallurgical Corp. v. Peerless InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- J. Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New England, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Brass and Copper Workers Federal Labor Union No. 19322, Afl-Cio v. American Brass Company, Kenosha Division, a Subsidiary of Anaconda Copper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- Appeal of Hillsborough County Nursing HomeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.