Legal Opinion

Rogerson v. Fitzpatrick

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 2005No. COA04-696PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSON, Judge.

Plaintiff filed this suit against defendants jointly, severally and individually in 1991, asserting a claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged violations of his Fourth Amendment rights by defendants, who were all police officers at the time. In November 2003, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff filed a cross motion for summary judgment in December 2003. On 16 February 2004, the trial court denied the motions for summary judgment. Defendants appeal. For the reasons below, we affirm.

On 17 February 1990 at approximately 11:30 p.m., plaintiff, an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. George Jones, Cross-Appellant v. City of Chicago, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. George Rakovich v. Gregory Wade and Darryl Drake, George Rakovich v. Chester KassCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parker v. Town of ErwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  2. Parker v. HyattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. N.C. State Bd. of Educ. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. Jensen v. JessamyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  5. Mitchell v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API