Legal Opinion

Corkins v. Corkins

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1960No. Docket 7, Calendar 48,064PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This is an action to set aside a deed. The principal ground relied upon is that it was not delivered to the grantee during the lifetime of the grantor. Ancillary relief, also, was requested.

The deed complained of, identified and sometime hereafter described as exhibit 1, was executed shortly before the marriage of the grantor, John C. Corkins. At this time he had 4 children by a prior marriage. One of them, the eldest son, 17 years of age'at the time,'was the grantee of the deed, in ■Question.' After the grantor’s death, some 20 years later, Ms widow, plaintiff herein, found the deed in his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fox v. Barrett's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Bishop v. ShurlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Lintner Estate v. MeierMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StiborIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Resh v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Woodrow v. JohnsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Hackett v. HackettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Hanifin v. MarsdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API