Legal Opinion

The Eugene F. Moran

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 8, 1906PublishedCited by 6 opinions

• In Admiralty. Suit for collision.

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, District Judge.

These are suits brought to recover damages for a collision. The New York Central Car Float No. 1 was lashed alongside of and being towed by the steam tug Charles E. Matthews up the North river. The two scows, 15D and 18D, owned by the Du Bois Sons Company, were being towed tandem on a hawser by the tug Eugene F. Moran. The car float came in collision with scow 15D, causing injury to both the scow and the car float. At the conclusion of the trial, I decided that the Matthews and the Moran were both in fault, and that there were no lights on either of the scows; and I…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The LyndhurstDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
  2. The Nettie L. TiceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1901
  3. Sherborne v. The N. & W. No. 4District Court, S.D. New York · 1893
  4. The MalingDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1901
  5. The BrothersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The Lizzie M. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
  2. Mesick & Mesick Transp. Co. v. New York, N. H. & H. R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1926
  3. United States v. Port of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1908
  4. The H. B. RawsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
  5. The AsfaltoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API