Legal Opinion

The Nettie L. Tice

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 28, 1901PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit for collision.

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

This action is brought by the owner of the canal-boat Frank X, which was in tow alongside of the tug Nettie F. Tice, on October 30, 1899, at 6 o’clock p. m., when the fireboat Zophar Mills, belonging to the city of New York, collided with the canal boat, doing the injury. Upon the trial it appeared plainly that the fireboat was at fault/and it also appeared that the Frank X and the Tice were each at fault, if each -was liable for failure to observe inspectors’ rule 11, which is as follows:

“For the government of pilots of vessels propelled by steam, gas, fluid, naphtha,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The LyndhurstDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. General Seafoods Corp. v. J. S. Packard Dredging Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  2. The ManhattanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
  3. The Eugene F. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  4. Triangle Cement Corp. v. Towboats CincinnatiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  5. Foster v. Merchants' & Miners' Transp. Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API