Legal Opinion

Wagmeister v. A. H. Robins Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 15, 1978No. 76-1102, 76-1611 consPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

This is an appeal from two orders, one entered June 2,1976, dismissing A. H. Robins Company (hereinafter “Robins”), the other entered September 24, 1976, dismissing Dr. Ernest Nora. Plaintiff contends: (1) that the court below erred in dismissing Robins without first hearing evidence; and (2) that the four-year statute of limitations applicable to breach of implied warranty actions is applicable in the case at bar. We affirm.

On June 2, 1975, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants. In substance, the complaint alleged that Robins manufactured a birth control device known as the Daikon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Berry v. G. D. Searle & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Sierens v. ClausenIllinois Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Church of the Nativity of Our Lord v. WatPro, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Malawy v. Richards Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Southerland v. Northeast Datsun, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1983
  4. Maldonado v. Creative Woodworking Concepts, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Quaker Alloy Casting Co. v. Gulfco Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API