Legal Opinion

Brady v. Reynolds Printasign Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the case remitted to the Appellate Division so that it may reconsider the matter and may exercise its own discretion.

The Appellate Division erred in holding, as a matter of law because the only excuse tendered by plaintiff constituted law office failure, that Special Term had abused its discretion in granting plaintiff’s motion to vacate defendants’ 90-day demand (CPLR 3216) and denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for plaintiff’s failure to serve a note of issue in response…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miskiewicz v. Hartley Restaurant Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Salch v. ParatoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Goodsell v. DavenportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API