Legal Opinion

State ex rel. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad v. Young

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 14, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Writ of prohibition, directed to respondent as judge of the district court for Hennepin county.

1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.

March 27, 1883, the railroad company, relator» executed to the firm of Bliss & Elliott a contract to convey to them 20,390.84 acres of land in the county of Carlton for the price of $153,147.63, secured by the notes of the firm, the last of which was-, to become due May 1, 1892. The contract contained conditions im respect to cutting and sawing into lumber the timber standing on the-land, which gave it its chief value. Upon compliance with the terms, of the contract, and payment of the purchase price, the vendor agreecL to convey the land; but in case of default the vendor was to have…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bush v. CrowtherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. In Re Declaration of Trust by BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Hancock-Nelson Mercantile Co. v. WeismanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Vilett v. MolerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Briggs v. SheaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API