Legal Opinion

Brown v. Napper

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1906No. Calendar No. 18,087PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Petition by George F. Brown and A. B. Cullen against Robert Napper and John E. Fitzpatrick for a writ of assistance : On motion of Robert Napper for leave to file a bill of review.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

This is an application for leave to file a bill of review, in a cause once before this court. See Brown v. Napper, 125 Mich. 117. The question there determined was that a decree for delinquent taxes for ] 893 was valid. It was decided at the October term, A." D. 1900, both parties being represented by counsel in both courts. The petition shows that the petitioner was served with the statutory notice in August, 1899, but relying upon the statements of his mortgagor, whose duty it was to pay the taxes, that said taxes had been paid, he contested the purchaser’s claim, and was defeated. Brown &…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. JordanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Brown v. NapperMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Sanford v. HainesMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Sherwood v. Central Michigan Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Napper v. FitzpatrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pomeroy v. NoudMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API