Kuemmel v. Vradenburg
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Concurrence
NORVELL, Justice.
I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice POPE and agree with the reasons therein stated for affirming the judgment appealed from. To my mind, this is not a proper case for the submission of the rebuttal issue of “sole proximate cause.” Con-cededly the submission of this issue under certain factual circumstances is sanctioned by precedent in this State,, but the issue rs something of an anomaly and the enlargement of its use is not favored.
We say that if there be one “sole proximate cause” there cannot be several “proximate causes” and, therefore, if some action other than that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lombardi v. WalladSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Butler v. SpratlingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951