Legal Opinion

Faulkner v. Millar

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 24, 1995No. 24283PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Waller, Justice:

John and Mary Millar (Sellers) appeal an order of the Master in Equity requiring them to refund the $45,000 earnest money deposit paid by Respondent, Gordon Faulkner (Purchaser), on their Hilton Head home. Sellers were also ordered to pay Purchaser $28,697.98 in costs and attorneys fees. We affirm.

FACTS

The dispute in this matter concerns a contract between the parties under which Purchaser was to buy Sellers’ home in Wexford Plantation. Central to the dispute is an Addendum which states, in part:

Purchaser(s) obligations hereunder are subject to a satisfactory engineering…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Southern Development Land & Golf Co. v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Citizens' Bank v. HeywardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  3. A. C. Tuxbury Lumber Co. v. ByrdSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  4. Hobgood v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Prime Group, Inc. v. Northern Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lowcountry Open Land Trust v. Charleston Southern UniversityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. The Huffines Co., LLC v. LockhartCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Dorman v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Madren v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Ingram v. Kasey's AssociatesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API