Legal Opinion

Matthieson v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 10, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from, Tama District Court.— Hon. Obed Caswell, Judge. Action to recover damages for a personal injury. Trial to jury, and verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

Dysart is a small way station on defendant’s line of railway. On one side of the depot building there is a platform fourteen feet in width, and extending the length of the depot, and for some distance beyond. This platform is used in loading and unloading freight, and also for the use of passengers in leaving and boarding defendant’s trains. From the platform one door opens into the depot waiting room, and another door opens into the freight and baggage room. On the day of the accident of which plaintiff complains, and in the forenoon, a freight train had stopped at the depot, and therefrom…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Chicago & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Willfong v. Omaha & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Greenleaf v. Dubuque & Sioux City RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. Camp v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Waterbury v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGovern v. Inter Urban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. McNaughton v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Keim v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API