Waterbury v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Plymouth District Court. — Hon. Scott M. Ladd, Judge. Action to recover damages for a personal injury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtKinne, C. J.
I. Plaintiff, a merchant in the town of Hudson, S. D., on December 80, 1893, went to the depot of the defendant in said town with hisi mother, she intending to take passage to Akron, Iowa. The negligence charged is “that.for a long time prior to the 30th day of December, 1893, the said defendant railroad company, carelessly,, negligently, and unlawfully suffered and permitted ice to accumulate on the platform adjacent to its passenger depot in said town of Hudson, .and on a place on said platform necessarily used by the public in going'to. and from the passenger trains stopping at said…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Larson v. American Bridge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- In Re Estate of McDadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Bender v. Incorporated Town of MindenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Davis v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.