Legal Opinion

New Homestead v. Iowa Department of Job Service

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 21, 1982No. 66541PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*270McCORMICK, Justice.

The question here is whether substantial evidence supports an Iowa Department of Job Service decision that claimant Barbara E. Garloch was available for work and earnestly and actively seeking work and therefore eligible for unemployment compensation. The district court held that the agency decision lacked sufficient evidentiary support. We reverse.

Under section 96.4(3), The Code, unemployment compensation may only be awarded to a person who “is able to work, is available for work, and is earnestly and actively seeking work.” A claimant has the burden of proof on the issue.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. Davoren v. Iowa Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  3. Brumley v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Norland v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  2. IBP, Inc. v. Al-GharibSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. Richards v. Iowa Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  4. Taylor v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  5. Roberts v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API