Legal Opinion

People v. Hutchings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant concerning County Court’s Sandoval ruling does not survive his plea of guilty (see, People v Ireland, 222 AD2d 1007; People v Gerber, 182 AD2d 252, 260-261, lv denied 80 NY2d 1026; People v Zangrillo, 105 AD2d 822). The failure of defense counsel to move to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 190.50 (5) (c) does not, by itself, render counsel’s performance ineffective (see, People v Mateo, 252 AD2d 821, lv denied 92 NY2d 927; People v Moragne, 233 AD2d 873, lv denied 89 NY2d 1097; People v Simmons, 202 AD2d 812, lv…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. GerberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. People v. MateoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. People v. ZangrilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. People v. BurroughsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hutchings v. HerbertDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
  2. People v. GosdinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API