Legal Opinion

State v. Winnex

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 1984No. 8318SC599PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

In his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in its “determination” as to the necessary evidence to sustain the charges of first degree kidnapping, first degree attempted rape, and first degree rape.

Defendant argues, inter alia, that the trial judge violated the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy by using facts which tend to prove the attempted first degree rape of Ms. Pagett to establish the elements of the first degree kidnapping of Ms. Pagett. A similar argument was rejected by our Supreme Court in State v. Williams, 295 N.C.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. North Carolina National Bank v. Virginia Carolina BuildersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. BenbowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. RozierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. JewellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. GrierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API